JAMB: South East Reps demand Oloyede’s resignation, 2025 UTME cancellation

JAMB logo

The South East Caucus in the House of Representatives has demanded the resignation of the Registrar of the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB), Prof. Ishaq Oloyede, over what it described as a “catastrophic institutional failure” in the conduct of the 2025 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME).

In a statement on Monday, the caucus, led by Hon. Igariwey Enwo, criticized JAMB for technical glitches that affected nearly 380,000 candidates, many of whom are now required to resit the exam. The lawmakers noted that all five South Eastern states were significantly impacted.

They condemned JAMB’s response as grossly inadequate, citing poor communication, scheduling conflicts with ongoing WAEC examinations, and short notice for the resit, which caused undue trauma to students and their families.

The statement reads in part: “Last week, particularly on May 14, 2025, the Registrar of JAMB, Professor Ishaq Oloyede, publicly admitted that due to a ‘technical glitch’ at some exam centres during the 2025 UTME, approximately 379,997 out of 1.9 million candidates would be required to resit the exam.

As a caucus, we are deeply concerned, as all five South Eastern states we represent were directly affected by these so-called ‘score distortions.’

Over the past week, we have exercised restraint, hoping JAMB would provide effective remedial measures to address this catastrophic institutional failure—one that has severely shaken public trust and the confidence of students and families nationwide.”

The caucus called for the immediate cancellation of the 2025 UTME and setting a new date, preferably after the WAEC and NECO exams, to avoid disadvantaging students. They also demanded the suspension of key officials responsible for JAMB’s digital operations and logistics.

While acknowledging Oloyede’s public admission of the failure, the lawmakers emphasized that accountability must go beyond apologies. They said his resignation would allow for an independent review of the failure and help restore public confidence in the examination body.